In the previous article, it was explained that the U-Space blueprint outlines a vision of integrated manned and unmanned aviation with the U-Space providing interfaces between the two. Air traffic management typically comprises three distinct activities: air traffic control, air traffic flow management, and aeronautical information services. The U-Space will more or less address all three of them relying on very high degree of automation and digital service.

On 16^th June 2017, the Single European Sky Air Traffic Management Research (SESAR) Joint Undertaking announced the U-space Blueprint which sets out the vision for traffic management for drones in low-level airspace. It aims to enable complex drone operations with a high degree of automation to happen in all types of operational environments, particularly in an urban context. The new vision hints at a future where highly complex operations in the crowded airspace will be dealt with by autonomous operation of software and sensors in the blink of an eye… Will this new vision live up to its promises of delivering a solution to enable large-scale commercial operations with drones in a safe and secure manner? What are the challenges and what will be the law’s response?

Usage and protection of domain names in the field of civil and commercial turnover are becoming more important in the Digital Era and continuously growing economic activity of legal entities on the Internet. The lack of legal regulation and unified approach to solving disputes regarding internet domains rights, raises a number of significant questions that turn into a field of scientific interest and provoke this study. The established concept of 'arbitrage' (and derivative "arbitration") in the theory and practice, which refers in this case to resolution of disputes in collision domains and trademarks, has become a mechanism for self-regulation of the emerging from this interaction public relations...

On March 9, 2017 the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) came forward with a decision on the Manni Case C-398/15, which clarified several key aspects of the right to be forgotten and more specifically some of the conditions under which the right can be exercised in pursuance of the erasure of data stored in public registers. The right to erasure, widely known as the right to be “forgotten”, emerged from CJEU’s case-law after the renowned Google Spain decision from the spring of 2014.

This report examines some questions about the responsibility of registrants when choosing a domain name, the use of domain names similar to other means of individualization and promotion, transfer domain and others. The role of Internet domains has been derived as a significant factor in market competition, according to the regulation in art. 35 of the Protection of Competition Act.